![]() ![]() The contribution of this article is to argue that there are considerable contrasts among students’ age groups from first to third concerning various categories of campus remodelling. ![]() Within the institutional remodelling the second and third age group students manifested positive outcomes while the first age group students exhibited negative outcomes. As for the psychological remodelling, the first and third age group of students had positive test results while the second met negative outcomes. Regarding the social remodelling, the first and third age group of students underwent positive net results while the second came across negative outcomes. As results, we observed that during the academic remodelling, the second and third age group of students experienced positive outcomes while the first faced negative results. We also used The Multivariate Analysis of Variance (Manova) test run with SPSS version 21 to contrast the student’s campus remodelling of UAIC by age group status of first (n = 837), second (n = 229), and third (n = 73) age group. ![]() As a method, we selected a multistage random sampling with n = 1140 students. This article tackles the evidence-based relationship between categories of campus remodelling across first to third age group of undergraduate students following a three-year study at Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi (UAIC) in Romania. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |